Perception and inference

The means of validly cognizing an object directly is perception (pratyaksha), and the means of validly cognizing an object indirectly is inference (anumana). 

The function of perception is to directly reveal the object present to the senses. Subsequently, it is interpreted by associating the object perceived with a verbal designation (nama) and concepts (vikalpa). It is then called perceptual judgment (adhyavasaya). However, this interpretation is the function of constructive imagination. 

Acharya Dignaga states: “The visual consciousness perceives something blue, but does not conceive that ‘this is blue’. In respect to an object, perception presents the sensation of the object itself, but does not possess any notion of its name.” 

Perception is a direct awareness of a unique particular (svalakshana), bereft of any conceptual understanding. As all conceptual understanding is the result of constructive imagination (kalpana), conceptual knowledge is neither a direct awareness nor an acquaintance with a real object as it is.

About Tashi Nyima

I am a Dharma student, and aspire to be a companion on the path. I trust that these texts can offer a general approach and basic tools for practicing the Buddha's way to enlightenment. ||| Soy un estudiante del Dharma, y aspiro a ser un compañero en el sendero. Espero que estos textos ofrezcan a algunos un mapa general y herramientas básicas para la práctica del sendero a la iluminación que nos ofrece el Buda.
This entry was posted in Dharma View and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s